2.
Watch Out When You Invest in Real Estate Regulations
have changed in our industry so much in
the past 15-20 years. The obligations
for us as agents to disclose everything
that we know about or should know about
to all parties involved in a real estate
transaction have become so unbelievably
all-important. Along with this, the
agency disclosures on who we represent
in each of our transactions must be very
clearly spelled out to our buyers and
sellers.
As
real estate agents, we are held to a
much higher degree of disclosure than
most other industries are. We are held
to be experts at what we do, having
fiduciary relationships with the people
we represent, and as such we must not do
anything that would cause us to gain an
economic advantage for ourselves while
simultaneously causing detriment to our
clients.
When
it comes to us investing in real estate
this also creates some touchy arenas for
us to deal with. As we are often
considered to be experts at what we do
we can also be held to have taken
economic advantage of sellers if we
purchase properties from them at what is
later considered to be below market
prices. This can be true even if we did
not utilize our real estate license in
the transaction and did not collect a
real estate commission from the seller.
In other situations, if we are
purchasing properties as investments and
are utilizing our real estate licenses
to collect commissions in the process,
we could truly be sealing our own fate.
Real
estate laws in the USA vary on a
state-by-state basis, but there is a
common underlying theme that applies to
many of the individual state laws.
Because of this, if you utilize your
real estate license to collect a
commission on a transaction in which you
are the buyer, you are most probably
held to an obligation of full disclosure
of anything that could affect the
seller's desire to sell the property to
you. So, if you are purchasing a
property that is not listed on the
market and you are buying it at a below
market price, you can easily be held to
have breached your obligation to the
seller to disclose all material facts
involved in the transaction. In summary,
you don't want to put yourself in this
position.
I'd
like to tell you a story that may
illustrate this in far greater detail
for you:
There's
a truly outstanding real estate agent
that I know by the name of Michael who
sells real estate in California. Several
years ago Michael purchased an
investment property for $650,000.00, and
it's possible that the property may have
actually been worth $700,000.00 at the
time he purchased it. Over the next 2-3
years this property appreciated in a
very hot real estate market and Michael
then sold the property to another
investor for $850,000.00. That's when
Michael's troubles began...
The
original owner that Michael had
purchased the property from had heard
about the recent sale and was angered by
the profit that Michael was making only
2-3 years after the original sale was
completed. He decided to sue Michael
claiming that while Michael utilized his
real estate license and collected a
commission on the original transaction,
Michael had also breached his obligation
of full disclosure as a real estate
agent in the transaction and had taken
advantage of him. He claimed that
Michael had purchased the property
unfairly from him at a below market
price.
Michael
was in a tough situation. He realized
that the cost of going the distance in
court through litigation would be about
$50,000.00 in legal fees, a lot of
mental and emotional aggravation, and
the possibility of losing his real
estate license. So to make matters
really simple and begin moving on with
his life, Michael decided to give the
previous owner of the property exactly
what he was looking for...100% of the
profit Michael was expecting to receive
on the sale of the property after
deducting the original $650,000.00
purchase price from the proceeds.
Now
keep in mind that the original owner of
the property had taken the $650,000.00
that he received from Michael 2-3 years
earlier and reinvested it in another
property at that time. And that property
had also appreciated incredibly over the
same 2-3 year period. So the original
seller was definitely coming out way
ahead of the game here on both
properties.
Which
leads me to my point in telling you this
story:
Talk
to a qualified real estate attorney in
your state and get very clear on what
your obligations are both as an agent
representing your clients, and as a
licensed real estate agent who wants to
invest in real estate. A little homework
in advance on your part with an attorney
who is truly an expert in this arena can
go a long way towards helping you to
avoid any situations like the one that
Michael experienced.
|